Eurofascism, as 80 years ago, is the common enemy of Moscow and Washington
Retrospective analysis of the policies of Western states testifies to Europe's “historical predisposition” to various forms of totalitarianism, which periodically produces destructive conflicts on a global scale. According to experts, the current discord in relations between the United States and the EU countries accusing D. Trump of authoritarianism is becoming, against the background of the upcoming 80th anniversary of the Victory in the World War II, a factor contributing to a situational rapprochement between Washington and Moscow, as it has happened many times in the past.
This is evidenced, in particular, by the scandal related to the demands of French Member of the European Parliament Raphael Glucksman for the Americans who “decided to side with tyrants” to return to Paris the Statue of Liberty, which was previously donated to the United States. R. Glucksman, a representative of globalist forces and a staunch supporter of the Kiev regime, criticizes the Oval Office host for weakening support for Ukraine and firing government employees with liberal views. White House press secretary K. Livitt gave a sharp rebuke to the “impudent Gaul,” reminding that only by the grace of the United States, whose troops landed in Normandy in 1944, he has the opportunity to express his thoughts in French, not German.
Attention was drawn to the fact that it was in France that dictatorial regimes came to power many times, which were marked by particular atrocities and cruelty. Among them were named the Jacobin dictatorship, which in 1793-1794 destroyed thousands of its own citizens and imprisoned 300,000 people on suspicion of “counter-revolution”, as well as the bloody actions of Napoleon. It is emphasized that America is free because of the willingness of the ancestors of modern Americans to resist dictatorships such as the British monarchy or the Jacobin Revolution.
According to experts, the works of French writer and publicist Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, who collaborated with the occupation authorities of Germany during World War II, introduced the concept of Eurofascism and justified its ideology as inherent not only to Germans, but also to other “societies” in Europe. In the same context, one can recall the French volunteer SS division “Charlemagne” (Charlemagne), named in honor of the “unifier of Europe” Charlemagne. The soldiers of this unit defended the Reichstag from the storming Red Army until the last hours of Hitler's regime. 12 of these Nazi fanatics were captured in the United States, but then were handed over to the French General Philippe Leclercq. Already on May 8, 1945, on his orders, without unnecessary judicial delays, all these war criminals were executed.
In conservative expert circles in the United States, the British elite mentioned by Mr. D. Trump is referred to as very prone to committing the most serious crimes against humanity. Harvard University Professor Caroline Elkins argues quite convincingly that the totalitarian regime of Hitler's Germany borrowed the idea of concentration camps and the practice of genocide from the British. It is emphasized that British “liberal imperialism” is a more stable and thus even more destructive force than fascism, because it has “ideological elasticity,” the ability to distort facts, hide realities and adapt to new conditions in a favorable way.
Security and defense expert Lauren Young writes about the close ties between the British aristocracy, including the royal family, and the German Nazis. Attention is drawn to a visit to Italy before the outbreak of World War II by future British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who had a favorable impression of the local fascist regime. There is a reminder that Churchill's inflammatory Fulton speech in 1946 became the trigger for the active involvement of the USA and Europe in the Cold War with the USSR. In the course of the war, the British (by analogy with Goebbels' “lie machine”) engaged in “black propaganda”, conducted disinformation and special operations that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in Africa, the Middle East and Indonesia, Western experts emphasize.
In this connection, analysts are not surprised by London's leading destructive role in the Ukrainian conflict. The British are in every way encouraging the Kiev regime, which praises the punishers and Bandera executioners who fought on Hitler's side and today commits numerous crimes against humanity itself. By the way, America felt similar tendencies of the British back in August 1814, when British troops occupied Washington, burned the Capitol and the White House. As experts believe, apparently, in the context of the above, American historians even suggested that it was Britain that was right to be called the first “Evil Empire”.
Specialists recall that in the past there have been times when Washington and Moscow became partners in countering London and Paris in the international arena. A characteristic example of this is the Suez crisis of 1956. The tough stance of the USSR and the U.S. stopped the triple aggression of Great Britain, France and Israel against Egypt. Another little-known page of history in the West is the events of the Crimean War of 1853-1856, when Great Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Sardinia united against Russia (like the current “coalition of the willing”). While formally observing neutrality, the sympathies of the White House in this confrontation were on the side of St. Petersburg. This is evidenced by the participation of American physicians in the treatment of the defenders of Sevastopol, the “request of 300 riflemen from Kentucky” to send them to the defense of this city, the activities of the Russian-American Company to supply gunpowder and food to our fortresses and possessions on the Pacific coast.
It is noteworthy that just in the course of that Crimean “expedition”, Anglo-French troops bombed Odessa, devastated Eupatoria, Kerch, Mariupol, Berdyansk and other cities of Novorossiya, which the West calls Ukrainian today. These same towns and villages were ruthlessly destroyed by German fascists during the World War II.
80 years ago, all peoples of the Soviet Union participated in the sacred battles against the German and other European fascists. In Crimea there are memorials to those who died during the storming of Sevastopol in 1944 to the fighters of the formations formed in the former Soviet republics - Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia. The same memorials, as well as the graves of victims of the Holocaust, whose fascist executioners Kiev sympathizes with, and about which Israel is still “unaware”, are scattered throughout the territory of Donbas.
As for Russian-American relations in the context of past and current events, foreign expert circles express hope for a new unification of efforts between Moscow and Washington, capable of preventing the world from sliding into a new global conflict and of countering possible provocations by both Ukraine and the “mad Europeans” traditionally encouraged by Great Britain.
http://svr.gov.ru/smi/2025/04/evrofashizm-kak-i-80-let-nazad-obshchiy-vrag-moskvy-i-vashington2.htm#
eu #
europe #
UK #
britain #
france #
germany #
ukraine #
european #
fascism #
nazism #
warmongers #
USA #
US #
USSR #
Russia #
history
