kuchinster

kuchinster@hub.hubzilla.de

A seeker of truth, with a keen sense of justice.

Ort:: Kharkov

Geschlecht:: Мужчина

Homepage:: https://hub.hubzilla.de/@kuchinster

Fri, 04 Nov 2022 13:22:42 +0100

kuchinster

kuchinster@hub.hubzilla.de

Sol schrieb den folgenden Beitrag Thu, 03 Nov 2022 08:56:06 +0100

NATO escalates (again) and achieves nothing (again)

#NATO #escalates ( #again ) and #achieves #nothing (again) #Ukraine #Russia #US #UK #EU #Europe #NS1 #NS2 #gas #pipelines #Crimea #Sevastopol #politics

"I think that we ought to begin this overview of what is currently taking place which is that the united West, aka the #AngloZionist Hegemony is desperate and in direct to this despair is doing all sorts of very foolish and plainly dangerous things. We all know about the The Big Three:
* The attack on NS1/NS2
* The attack on the Crimea Bridge (CB)
* The attack on the Black Sea Fleet (BSF) base in Sevastopol

Truth be told, these are three completely different events.

One is a pure act of international terrorism, both in the choice of target (a major civilian infrastructural object owned by several countries and corporate entities) and in the mode of execution (the use of remotely operated bombs). Most critically, while under international law collateral damage is not prohibited, the target of an attack has to be military and the collateral damage minimized to the absolute minimum.

The second one is a diversionary attack. That is an attack carried out by unconventional means, but whose target is at least partially a military one, which the Crimean Bridge definitely is. One could even argue that the actual death toll (4 if I remember correctly) and the very minor inconvenience to the civilians (traffic was at least partially restored in less than 24 hours, not to mention existing alternatives such as ferries) make that target legitimate by itself. In this case, it is the mode of execution – the use of a truck full of explosives driven either by a suicide bomber or unsuspecting civilian – which raises a lot of international law and law of war issues

The third attack was a purely military one. The intended target was the Russian Black Sea Fleet and the methods used (underwater, surface and airborne drones) are all, in my opinion, legitimate.

That being said, this all begs the question of what NATO was trying to achieve here:"

[...]